+31 20 820 3777
Support 
Documentation 
Login 
Bare metal server vs VM is one of the key choices when designing an IT infrastructure. Today, companies and developers can deploy workloads on physical servers, virtual machines, or hybrid environments. Each option has its strengths, and the right choice affects performance, cost, and scalability.
A review of infrastructure options today shows that bare metal and VM remain the main solutions. Cloud providers offer both formats, and private data centers combine them for different tasks. Technologies are evolving, but the fundamental differences between physical and virtual servers remain.
This comparison is especially important for developers, enterprises, and IT teams. Application performance, data security, and management flexibility depend on the choice of infrastructure. An incorrect approach can lead to excessive costs or a lack of resources.
This guide will help you understand the pros and cons of bare metal and VM. You will learn in which cases it is better to use a bare server, and when virtualization is more profitable. This will allow you to make an informed decision for your needs.
What Is a Bare Metal Server?
Bare Metal Server is a physical server fully dedicated to a single user or project. Unlike virtual machines, it does not have a virtualization layer, which provides direct access to hardware resources.
Key features of Bare Metal:
- No virtualization layer: the software runs directly on the hardware, without a hypervisor.
- Full control over the hardware: you can configure the BIOS, select disks, network cards and other components.
- Maximum performance: no virtualization overhead, which is critical for resource-intensive tasks.
Common use cases:
- High-load applications (game servers, transaction systems);
- Databases (e.g. PostgreSQL, MongoDB), where low latency is important;
- Industries with a high level of compliance (finance, public sector), requiring isolation.
When comparing bare metal vs virtual machine, the choice depends on the tasks. Bare Metal is suitable for applications where clean power and minimal latency are required.
What Is a Virtual Machine (VM)?
A virtual machine (VM) is a software emulation of a physical server running on a hypervisor. Unlike a bare metal server, a virtual machine does not have direct access to the hardware, but uses resources allocated to it (CPU, RAM, disk space).
Key features of virtual machines:
- Works on top of a hypervisor: it can be deployed both on bare metal and inside another virtual environment.
- Shared physical resources: several VMs share the power of one server, which increases the efficiency of hardware use.
- Flexibility and isolation: each VM operates independently, with its own OS and configuration.
Common use cases:
- Development and testing environments - quick deployment and cloning of isolated environments.
- Scalable web applications - load balancing between several VMs;
- Services with variable load - cloud solutions where it is important to quickly add resources.
When choosing between bare metal vs virtual machine, it is important to consider the objectives: VMs provide flexibility and cost savings. Bare metal provides maximum performance and control.
Bare Metal vs VM: Key Differences
Choosing between bare metal and VM is an important decision. It affects the performance, cost, and scalability of your infrastructure. Both options have their advantages, but are suitable for different tasks.
In this section, we compare key aspects: from speed to security. You will learn when to choose a dedicated server and when virtualization is better. This will help you make an informed decision for your project.
Performance
Bare metal servers provide maximum performance because applications work directly with hardware resources. This is optimal for resource-intensive tasks: DBMS, big data analytics, and highly loaded applications.
VMs show slightly lower performance due to the overhead of the hypervisor. However, for most standard tasks (web applications, microservices), the difference is almost unnoticeable.
Resource Isolation
In bare metal vs VM comparison, a physical server provides absolute isolation. You get all the server resources without "noisy neighbors", which is critical for stable operation.
Virtual machines use shared host resources. Although modern hypervisors provide good isolation, peak loads of neighboring VMs can affect performance.
Scalability
Bare metal servers are more difficult to scale - they require physical addition of hardware. The process can take from several hours to days.
VMs scale instantly. In cloud environments, you can automatically add resources or create new instances in minutes.
Flexibility and Management
Bare metal vs virtual machine: physical servers are less flexible to manage. Changing the configuration often requires a reboot and physical intervention.
VMs allow you to quickly change parameters (CPU, RAM, disks) without downtime. Instant snapshot and migration capabilities make them more convenient for DevOps.
Cost Structure
Bare metal requires significant capital expenditures. However, with a constant high load, the TCO can be lower than that of VMs.
VMs work on a subscription model with pay-as-you-go. This is beneficial for variable loads, but can be more expensive with constant use.
Security and Compliance
Bare metal servers provide the highest security, as they eliminate the risks associated with the hypervisor. This is important for industries with strict compliance requirements.
VMs also provide a good level of security, especially in private clouds. However, the requirements for the hypervisor and multi-tenancy raise questions.
| Category | Bare Metal Servers | Virtual Machines |
| Performance | Direct hardware access with no virtualization overhead. Delivers maximum performance for resource-intensive applications. Fixed resource allocation limits flexibility. | Suitable for most standard workloads. Minor performance impact from hypervisor layer. More efficient resource utilization. |
| Isolation | Complete physical isolation with dedicated resources. No risk of noisy neighbor effects. Less efficient for variable workloads. | Logical isolation between instances. Potential performance fluctuations from shared host resources. |
| Scalability | Requires physical hardware changes for scaling. Delivers consistent performance at scale. | Instant vertical and horizontal scaling capabilities. Automatic load distribution across instances. |
| Flexibility | Hardware customization requires physical changes. Full control over physical components. | Dynamic resource allocation and adjustment. Rapid provisioning and snapshot capabilities. |
| Cost Structure | Higher upfront capital expenditure. Better long-term value for constant high-utilization workloads. | Operational expenditure model with pay-as-you-go pricing. Potentially higher costs for continuous full utilization. |
| Security | Reduced attack surface with no hypervisor layer. Preferred for strict compliance requirements. | Secure isolation through hypervisor. Additional security considerations for multi-tenant environments. |
| Management | Requires physical maintenance and hands-on administration. Complete control over the environment. | Centralized management through virtualization platforms. Extensive automation capabilities. |
| Best Applications | High-performance computing, financial systems, GPU workloads, latency-sensitive applications. | Development environments, web applications, cloud-native services, variable workloads. |
When to Use Bare Metal Servers
Use a bare metal server in the following cases:
- For resource-intensive applications: Choose bare metal server for databases (Oracle, MongoDB), analytics systems and high-load APIs. Physical servers provide maximum performance without virtualization overhead.
- When working with GPUs: For machine learning, rendering and computing tasks, bare metal is an obvious choice. Direct access to GPU/TPU provides up to 30% more performance compared to virtualized solutions.
- In the financial sector: Banks and payment systems choose bare metal servers due to PCI DSS requirements. Complete isolation eliminates the risks inherent in multi-tenant VM solutions.
- For low-latency operations: Trading systems and VoIP services require a bare metal approach. Latencies are reduced by 15-20% compared to virtual environments.
- With a stable high load: If the server is constantly loaded at 70-100%, bare metal server is more economical. Renting a physical server for 1-2 years is cheaper than similar VM configurations.
- For non-standard configurations: When specific RAID arrays, network cards or low-level BIOS settings are needed, bare metal is the only option. Virtualization limits access to the hardware layer.
- In fields with significant requirements: Government agencies and medical institutions often choose bare metal due to audit and certification requirements. Physical servers are easier to document and inspect.
When to Use Virtual Machines
Use virtual machines in the following cases:
- Development and testing: Virtual machines allow you to quickly create isolated environments for testing different configurations without the need for physical hardware.
- Intermittent workloads: For projects with seasonal or unpredictable workloads, VMs provide flexible scaling of resources on demand.
- Cloud deployments: VMs are ideal for cloud environments where the ability to quickly deploy and migrate between servers is important.
- Start-up projects: For startups and small applications, VMs offer an affordable entry level without a large investment in hardware.
- Microservice architectures: VMs are great for containerized applications and microservices, simplifying their deployment and management.
- Backup: VM snapshots allow you to easily back up and restore systems in minutes.
- Budget savings: Pay-as-you-go pricing makes VMs a cost-effective solution for projects with limited budgets.
Conclusion
The choice between bare metal server vs VM depends on the specific tasks and requirements of your project. Bare metal servers provide maximum performance and security. This is important for highly loaded systems and industries with high demands. VMs offer flexibility and scalability. They are well suited for development, cloud solutions and variable loads.
When comparing bare metal vs VM, it is important to consider not only technical characteristics. Consider economic factors as well. Bare metal is advantageous for stable high loads. VM is more economical for startups and projects with intermittent traffic.
Modern IT infrastructures often use a hybrid approach, combining both solutions. For example, bare metal for databases and VM for web servers. This approach allows you to get the benefits of both technologies.
Ultimately, the choice between bare metal server vs VM should be based on an analysis of performance, security, budget and scaling plans. Both solutions have their strengths and are optimal for different use cases.